CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL - 30.11.2023

Employee denied phased return to work wins £29,000

An employee who was denied a phased return to work after having extensive surgery on both of her wrists has been awarded over £29,000 in compensation by the tribunal. What was the legal issue here?

Long-term condition

In 2013 Leslie Bristow (B) was diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome in both of her wrists. This is a nerve-related condition which causes numbness, weakness and tingling in the thumbs and fingers.

In November 2018, B began working as a night duty care assistant for Craigard Care (C), which is based in Scotland.

Surgery needed

Later, in early 2021, B underwent surgeries on both of her wrists to alleviate the symptoms caused by her carpal tunnel syndrome. Unfortunately, the surgeries caused further issues which resulted in B being absent from work for over a year.

In February 2022 B’s doctor recommended that she could return to work on “light duties”, otherwise known as a “phased return to work”.

A phased return

B, therefore, arranged to meet with her employer and a senior manager, Janene Whyte (W), also attended that meeting. B explained her doctor’s advice and that she could now start back at work on two three-hour shifts each week.

Upon hearing this, W aggressively replied: “Don’t think you can just swan in here when you feel like it and say you’re coming back to work… If you can’t do a full shift, there’s no job here for you” .

Further meeting

B was then asked to attend a further meeting on 3 March 2022. However, she became fearful of W being at this meeting and that she would be treated in a similar way by W.

Consequently, B contacted her GP on 2 March 2022 who signed her off work. She then resigned on 4 March 2022.

Constructive dismissal

B brought various claims in the tribunal which included constructive dismissal , disability discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments.

The tribunal has now found in B’s favour and awarded her over £29,000 in compensation (see The next step ).

Fatal error

The employer in this case lost because the employee’s request for a phased return on medical advice - which was a reasonable adjustment in this instance - was dismissed out of hand.

The tribunal further concluded that B was entitled to treat this as a “last straw” event, entitling her to resign and claim constructive dismissal .

Tip. Don’t dismiss a request for a phased return to work following sickness absence without giving it full consideration, especially if it is made following medical advice. If you are unsure whether a phased return is suitable, seek independent occupational health advice.

For the tribunal’s ruling in this case, visit https://www.tips-and-advice.co.uk, Download Zone, year 25, issue 22.

The employee’s request for a phased return to work - which had been made on medical advice - amounted to a reasonable adjustment. When it was dismissed out of hand, the employee was entitled to resign and claim constructive dismissal. Always fully consider requests for a phased return to work and take occupational health advice if necessary.

© Indicator - FL Memo Ltd

Tel.: (01233) 653500 • Fax: (01233) 647100

subscriptions@indicator-flm.co.ukwww.indicator-flm.co.uk

Calgarth House, 39-41 Bank Street, Ashford, Kent TN23 1DQ

VAT GB 726 598 394 • Registered in England • Company Registration No. 3599719